Whistler's Symphony in White, No. 1 (1876): |
Below is
the rough reading schedule for next week. The readings are suggested
goals to keep you on track with the reading.
However, there is no immediate penalty for being a dozen or so pages
behind! Pages below correspond to the Bedford/St.Martin's edition.
Monday:
Chs.I-V (pp.26-83)
Wednesday:
Chs.VI-X (pp.83-147)
Friday:
Chs. XI-XIII (pp.147-189)
Answer ONE
of the following for Friday
1. Last
week we discussed theories of identity and constructions of the
'subject.' How do the characters of either Johnathan Harker or
Dracula address some of these issues in their 'performance' of
identity? Consider the following quotes as you respond:
* Harker:
"I felt in my heart a wicked, burning desire that they would
kiss me with those red lips. It is not good to note this down, lest
some day it should meet Mina's eyes and cause her pain; but it is the
truth" (Ch.III/61).
* Dracula:
"Here I am noble; I am boyar;
the common people know me, and I am master. But a stranger in a
strange land, he is no one; men know him not--and to know not is to
care not for" (Ch.II/45).
2.
Dracula has no single
narrator binding the entire novel together from either an omniscient
or an unreliable point of view. Rather, the book is cobbled together
from several different narrators, some consciously narrating
(Harker's diary, Mina and Lucy's letters, etc.), while others are
forced into the role unknowingly (newspaper reports, phonograph
recordings, shipping receipts). How does this affect how we read the
work and understand even the simplest ideas of plot,
characterization, and narration? Is the entire work 'unreliable'?
Or does the factual nature of the sources (private diaries, public
newspaper clippings) make it more reliable than our previous works?
3. When
Harker first beholds the three 'brides' of Dracula, he remarks, "I
seemed somehow to know her face, and to know it in connection with
some dreamy fear, but I could not recollect at the moment how or
where" (Ch.III/61). How might we use Freud's theory of "the
Uncanny" to read this passage and others in the opening
chapters, even though the monsters are clearly real? Is
the Uncanny still valid when actual horrors are unloosed upon the
fictional world?
4.
How does Stoker's characterization of Dracula differ from modern
versions of Dracula and of vampires in general? Though Dracula is
not the first literary vampire in England (he is preceded by
Polidori's Lord Ruthven by several decades), he created the
prototypical mythology that all subsequent vampires follow.
Nevertheless, Stoker's 'Dracula' shows some remarkable differences
that often surprise or even disappoint readers. What might these
be...and what might Stoker's intentions have been in writing him this
way?